Archive for October 2017
Cooperation, Coexistence, or Opposition? Investor-State dispute settlement on the basis of European comprehensive free trade agreements and the Court of Justice of the European Union
Presentation at the Institute of European Law (Institutet för Europeisk rätt) at the University of Stockholm
Read MoreLegal Expert Opinion on Art. 28 of the Constitution of the State of Berlin
With the involvement of PD Dr. A. Berger Expert Opinion for the Verein zur Förderung von Wohneigentum in Berlin The expert opinion can be ordered at https://www.verein-wohneigentum.de/gutachten/
Read MoreCo-Rapporteur for the Break-Out-Session „Towards a global reform effort – improving dispute settlement“ in the context of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) High-level International Investment Agreement Conference 2017: Moving to the Next Phase of IIA Reform
More Information:
Read MoreCo-Rapporteur of the Break-out-session „Consolidating the IIA network“ in the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) High-level International Investment Agreement Conference 2017: Moving to the Next Phase of IIA Reform
More Information:
Read MorePredators in the pond of jurisdiction? The EU constitutional restraints on investor-State dispute settlement provisions in European comprehensive free trade agreements.
Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), once developed as ‘last straw’ for foreign investors to gain access to justice in the forgotten corners of this world, grew out of its niche existence – for the better or the worse. In a remarkable metamorphosis ISDS made its way not only into trade agreements among what was once called…
Read More
