Skip to content

Posts Tagged ‘ISDS’

The Price for a Seat at the ISDS Reform Table – CJEU’s clearance of the EU’s investment protection policy in Opinion 1/17 and its impact on the EU constitutional order

Steffen Hindelang: The Price for a Seat at the ISDS Reform Table – CJEU’s clearance of the EU’s investment protection policy in Opinion 1/17 and its impact on the EU constitutional order. In: Biondi, Andrea; Sangiuolo, Giorgia (Ed.): Judicial Protection and EU Free Trade Agreements, Edward Elgar Publishing, Forthcoming. AbstractThe CJEU in Opinion 1/17 concluded…

Read More

Investment Screening – It Is Always Darkest Before the Dawn – Presentation at the Munich Security Conference International Law Forum 2020

It was a great pleasure presenting at the Munich Security Conference International Law Forum on the topic of #investmentscreening and discuss together with other trade panellists Naboth van den Broek, Kathleen Claussen, Shirin Saif, Gustav Flecke-Giammarco, and a distinguished audience. For more on this topic, please join ERA’s Jens Hillebrand Pohl and Steffen Hindelang of…

Read More

Presentation on “The price for a seat at the ISDS reform table: CJEU’s clearance of the EU’s investment protection policy and its impact on the EU constitutional order” in Conference on Investment Courts and the Union’s Legal Order at Stockholm University

The price for a seat at the ISDS reform table I presented on the topic “The price for a seat at the ISDS reform table: CJEU’s clearance of the EU’s investment protection policy in Opinion 1/17 and its impact on the EU constitutional order” on Thursday, 06.02.2020 at Stockholm University in the Conference on “Investment…

Read More

Legal Opinion on behalf of the Republic of Poland in Republic of Poland ./. PL Holdings S.Á.R.L before the Swedish Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen)

AdobeStock_87725041

More Information on the Case Republic of Poland ./. PL Holdings S.Á.R.L, Case No. T 1569-19 The opinion deals with questions such as whether an EU Member State court is required to set aside an intra-EU investor-State arbitral award within the respective national procedures providing for setting aside due to a lack of a valid…

Read More

Public Defence of Ph.D. Thesis of Dr Hannes Lenk at Gothenburg University

On 20th September, Hannes Lenk successfully defended his Ph.D. thesis entitled “The EU investment court system. A viable reform initiative?”. I had the pleasure of serving as “opponent” in the public defence at the School of Business, Economics and Law (Handelshögskolan), Department of Law (Juridiska institutionen) of the University of Gothenburg. The examination committee consisted…

Read More

The Interrelations between Investment Treaty Standards and Other International Legal Regimes

Presentation on “The Interrelations between Investment Treaty Standards and Other International Legal Regimes (Human Rights, Sustainable Development, Cultural Property, Indigenous Peoples and other Non-Economic Interests) as a Rule of Law Problem”, together with Patricia Stöbener Presented within the meeting of the ILA Committee on “Rule of Law and International Investment Law” – Workshop “Investment Protection…

Read More

ISDS and ECT after Achmea V: Expert Declaration in Support of Spain’s Motion to Dismiss Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award in Foresight Luxembourg Solar 1 S.À.R.L., Foresight Luxembourg Solar 2 S.À.R.L., Greentech Energy Systems a/s, (Now known as Athena Investments a/s), GWM Renewable Energy I s.p.a., GWM Renewable Energy II s.p.a. v. Kingdom of Spain

(c) AdobeStock_89632670

More Information on the Case Rechtsgutachten insbesondere zur Vereinbarkeit von Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren nach dem Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) im intra-EU Kontext mit dem Unionsrecht nach der EuGH-Entscheidung in Achmea (C-284/16). Untited States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Foresight Luxembourg Solar 1 S.À.R.L., Foresight Luxembourg Solar 2 S.À.R.L., Greentech Energy Systems a/s, (Now…

Read More

ISDS and ECT after Achmea IV: Expert Declaration in Support of Spain’s Motion to Dismiss Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award in Masdar Solar & Wind Cooperatief U.A. v. Kingdom of Spain

(c) AdobeStock_89632670

More Information on the Case Expert Declarations in Support of Spain’s Motion to Dismiss Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award in Untited States District Court for the District of Columbia, Masdar Solar & Wind Cooperatief U.A. v. Spanien, Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-02254-JEB Further Publications The Price for a Seat at the ISDS Reform Table – CJEU’s…

Read More
Scroll To Top