Beiträge mit dem Stichwort: ‘BITs̵
Stocktaking of investment protection provisions in EU agreements and Member States’ bilateral investment treaties and their impact on the coherence of EU policy
Conceptualisation and Application of the Principle of Autonomy of EU Law – The CJEU’s Judgement in Achmea Put in Perspective
Steffen Hindelang: Conceptualisation and Application of the Principle of Autonomy of EU Law – The CJEU’s Judgement in Achmea Put in Perspective. In: European Law Review, 44 , Forthcoming. AbstractIt seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea judgement…
WeiterlesenCo-Rapporteur für die Arbeitsgruppe „Consolidating the IIA network“ im Rahmen der United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) High-level International Investment Agreement Conference 2017: Moving to the Next Phase of IIA Reform
Mehr Informationen: Break-out session 3
WeiterlesenThe Day after: Alternatives to intra-EU BITs
Member State BITs – There’s Still (Some) Life in the Old Dog Yet. Incompatibility of Existing Member State BITs with EU Law and Possible Remedies
The Missing Bit – To Be Substituted by BITs? The Inadequacy of Russian Law as an Example for Indirect Expropriation
Bilateral Investment Treaties, Custom and a Healthy Investment Climate – The Question of Whether BITs Influence Customary International Law Revisited
