Beiträge mit dem Stichwort: ‘Investor-State-Arbitration̵

Conceptualisation and Application of the Principle of Autonomy of EU Law – The CJEU’s Judgement in Achmea Put in Perspective

Conceptualisation and Application of the Principle of Autonomy of EU Law – The CJEU’s Judgement in Achmea Put in Perspective

Steffen Hindelang: Conceptualisation and Application of the Principle of Autonomy of EU Law – The CJEU’s Judgement in Achmea Put in Perspective. In: European Law Review, 44 , Forthcoming. AbstractIt seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea judgement…

Weiterlesen

The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s Achmea Judgement

Re-Organizing Europe’s Judicial Power through the Backdoor?

Steffen Hindelang: The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s Achmea Judgement. VerfBlog, 2018/3/09, 2018. AbstractIt seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea Decision less than fifteen pages to conclude that Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), as we know it, shall…

Weiterlesen

TTIP Hearing European Parliament

TTIP Hearing European Parliament

Joint Public Hearing European Parliament – Committees on Legal Affairs and on International Trade on ISDS and Arbitration in TTIP Professor Hindelang presented and discussed the key findings of the Studies on „Investor-State Dispute Settlement provisions in the EU’s international investment agreements (ISDS)“ by Professor Kuijper, Professor Pernice, and Professor Hindelang in the European Parliament JURI/INTA…

Weiterlesen
image_pdfimage_print

Durch die weitere Nutzung der Seite stimmen Sie der Verwendung von Cookies zu. Weitere Informationen

Die Cookie-Einstellungen auf dieser Website sind auf "Cookies zulassen" eingestellt, um das beste Surferlebnis zu ermöglichen. Wenn du diese Website ohne Änderung der Cookie-Einstellungen verwendest oder auf "Akzeptieren" klickst, erklärst du sich damit einverstanden.

Schließen