Beiträge mit dem Stichwort: ‘Investor-State-Arbitration̵
Nominierung für die Liste der Vermittler des Internationalen Zentrums zur Beilegung von Investitionsstreitigkeiten, Washington, D.C., durch die Bundesrepublik Deutschland für den Zeitraum 2019-2025
Das Internationale Zentrum zur Beilegung von Investitionsstreitigkeiten (ICSID) ist eine internationale Schiedsinstitution mit Sitz in Washington, D.C., das der Weltbankgruppe angehört. Nominierung für die ICSID Liste der Vermittler durch die Bundesrepublik Deutschland für den Zeitraum 2019-2025. Aktuelle Beratungsprojekte im Themenbereich Nominierung für die Liste der Vermittler des Internationalen Zentrums zur Beilegung von Investitionsstreitigkeiten, Washington, D.C.,…
WeiterlesenThe Interrelations between Investment Treaty Standards and Other International Legal Regimes
Vortrag zu „The Interrelations between Investment Treaty Standards and Other International Legal Regimes (Human Rights, Sustainable Development, Cultural Property, Indigenous Peoples and other Non-Economic Interests) as a Rule of Law Problem“, gemeinsam mit Patricia Stöbener Gehalten im Rahmen des Treffens des ILA Committee on “Rule of Law and International Investment Law” – Workshop „Investment Protection…
WeiterlesenPräsentation zu „Investment Arbitration: If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change“ im Rahmen des ICC Copenhagen Arbitration Day 2019 – Lunch Seminar zu „Investment Arbitration in a Post-truth World“
Poster Lunch Seminar 201900403_Poster-investment-arbitration Programme ICC Copenhagen Arbitration Day 2019 20190225_ICCProgramme2019final Presentation 20190403_HINDELANG_Presentation_Copenhagenn_2019_FINAL
WeiterlesenStocktaking of investment protection provisions in EU agreements and Member States’ bilateral investment treaties and their impact on the coherence of EU policy
European Parliament INTA Workshop: EU Investment Protection after the ECJ Opinion on Singapore: Questions of Competence and Coherence
Presentation 20190219_Hindelang_Presentation_EP_FINAL
WeiterlesenConceptualisation and Application of the Principle of Autonomy of EU Law – The CJEU’s Judgement in Achmea Put in Perspective
Steffen Hindelang: Conceptualisation and Application of the Principle of Autonomy of EU Law – The CJEU’s Judgement in Achmea Put in Perspective. In: European Law Review, 44 (3), S. 383-400, 2019. AbstractIt seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its…
WeiterlesenThe Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s Achmea Judgement
Steffen Hindelang: The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s Achmea Judgement. VerfBlog, 2018/3/09, 2018. AbstractIt seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea Decision less than fifteen pages to conclude that Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), as we know it, shall…
WeiterlesenMapping the Grey Areas: Private-public Standards Referenced in International Investment Agreements
Vortrag an der Universität Tokio, 95th GSDM Platform Seminar / International Symposium „Private Standards and Global Governance: Possibilities and Challenges“ Programme: Plat95_Program_Ver.9(090118)_E
WeiterlesenCo-Rapporteur für die Arbeitsgruppe „Towards a global reform effort – improving dispute settlement“ im Rahmen der United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) High-level International Investment Agreement Conference 2017: Moving to the Next Phase of IIA Reform
Mehr Informationen: Break-out session 6
WeiterlesenCo-Rapporteur für die Arbeitsgruppe „Consolidating the IIA network“ im Rahmen der United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) High-level International Investment Agreement Conference 2017: Moving to the Next Phase of IIA Reform
Mehr Informationen: Break-out session 3
Weiterlesen